I had a whole other topic I was going to use for this month’s blog, but then came news that the(ICC), which develops building codes used throughout the U.S., had released the preliminary results of the vote on to the 2021 International Building Code – and the result was a huge win for mass timber and tall wood buildings. Actually it was 14 wins, as all 14 proposed changes were approved by the ICC governmental voting members. Once certified by the ICC’s voting committee and board, the provisions clear the way for three new construction types involving mass timber to be included in the 2021 International Building Code. Those three building types set building safety standards and protocols for wood buildings up to nine, 12 and 18 stories.
“Approval of the tall mass timber changes is truly historic. For the past 100-plus years, model codes have consistently recognized traditional types of construction, and for the most part, they have remained unchanged until now,” saysVice President Ken Bland, a key player in the effort to develop the proposals and educate ICC voters.
The news, of course, is a big win for the mass timber industry. It’s also a big win for Oregon, particularly for rural economic development efforts. Oregon is home to two of the three mass-timber-panel-producing facilities in the U.S. that hold the certification needed for making mass timber panels that can be used to construct buildings and for other structural applications. Cross-laminated timber producer, based in Riddle, and mass plywood panel producer , in Lyons, are well-positioned suppliers for what is sure to be an uptick in demand for mass timber building materials.
The ICC vote is also a win for the building and design community across the country because it provides architects and contractors one more prescriptively allowed option that aligns with building codes when they’re considering which materials to use for designing and building commercial structures.
In addition, it’s a win for our forests because the mass timber industry has vast potential as a badly needed outlet for the type of timber harvested during forest restoration activities throughout the inland West. Finding a place for that wood fiber is critical as we seek ways to cover the costs of bringing overstocked forests back to a more fire-resilient, healthy state.
Perhaps most important, it’s a win for the environment. Because, wood buildings are a significant tool in the fight against climate change. These code changes provide an easier path for tall wood buildings to be permitted and built, and therefore a lot more carbon can be sequestered and stored in these structures. When that happens, we all win.
Attention now turns toward encouraging states and other jurisdictions to adopt these code changes as quickly as possible. Even though the changes are part of the 2021 International Building Code, there is nothing that restricts jurisdictions from adopting them prior to then. In fact, Oregon is leading the way in that regard, having voted this past summer to adopt the changes into the state’s 2019 structural code and establishing afor applying the changes. This became effective in August. Washington is right there with us, having voted Nov. 30 to into its building code. And California is not far behind. Gov. Jerry Brown issued an calling for the state’s building code agencies to review the new code changes and consider proposing their adoption in the next code cycle, which would be California’s 2019 building code.
We now have even more. May you all have a happy and healthy holiday season.
Director of Forest Products
Attending the annualNational Convention is always one of the high points of my year. One of the ways I participate is by volunteering to moderate a few technical sessions. I choose sessions that pique my interest. They’re usually related to forestry education, forest policy, private forestry or silviculture.
When the convention was held in Portland in October I had the chance to moderate an excellent session on education, extension and communication. One of the talks during the session was perhaps the best I listened to at this year’s convention. It was titled “Best Management Practices Field Guides: Are they at Optimum Readability for Effective Implementation?” The talk was given by Emily Paye, a graduate student from the State University of New Yorkin Syracuse, NY.
As indicated by the title of her talk, Emily’s research used standard readability indices to evaluate best-management-practices field manuals from various states. In her introduction, Emily pointed out that the average American reads at about a seventh-grade level. The purpose of her research was to find out if the average American reader would be able to understand the field guides written to educate landowners on the best forest management practices to protect water, soil and wildlife in their states.
Emily evaluated all the field guides she could find online, and used three different indices. Here is what she found as the average for each index for the Western states:
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Index: 12.19
Gunning-Fog Index: 14.14
Coleman-Liau Index: 12.12
What this means is that to read and understand these field guides you should be able to read at a 12th- to 14th-grade reading level. This, of course, is much higher than the average American’s seventh-grade reading level.
I was disappointed to see that the OFRI publicationwas not included in the list of field guides Emily reviewed. When I brought this to her attention she said she assumed the manual was aimed at regulators, not landowners. I told her it actually is very much a field guide for forest landowners and loggers.
Emily volunteered to evaluate the readability of Oregon’s Forest Protection Laws and followed up with me after the convention to get an electronic version. I sent one to her, and here’s what her analysis showed:
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Index: 9.3
Gunning-Fog Index: 11.58
Coleman-Liau Index: 7.86
While we didn’t quite match the reading level of the average American with Oregon’s Forest Protection Laws, we did better than the field guides Emily evaluated from other Western states.
We apparently have some work to do – but I want to point out that grade-level readability was not explicitly used as a tool when we wrote Oregon’s Forest Protection Laws. It will be next time.
In the meantime, if you want to see if your reading level is high enough to grasp the material in the newly revised third edition of Oregon’s Forest Protection Laws, check it out online or order a copy
For the forest,
Director of Forestry
This past week, I was among a group of Oregonians who traveled to Washington, D.C., for the events leading up to and including the lighting of the 2018. I was honored to be among a group that showcased the best of Oregon.
This year’s tree was harvested from Oregon’s own. It was an approximately 75-foot noble fir that made a 3,000-mile reverse journey on the Oregon Trail.
The tree itself was representative of the best of Oregon’s abundant forests, but that was really just one piece of the story. During the many events that celebrated the tree in Washington, I came to appreciate everything and everyone from Oregon who played roles from small to large to put Oregon’s best foot forward on the national stage.
On my first morning in D.C. I walked around the West Lawn of the Capitol and spotted the tree, which displayed some of the more than 10,000 Christmas ornaments that were handmade by Oregonians from all over the state.
At the first event of the week, held at, the tree’s partners were honored. Among them was the presenting sponsor, , which is celebrating its 80th year in business in Oregon. Also recognized at this event was the town of home to the U.S. Forest Service , where the tree was grown. This was also the first time I met Brigette Harrington, a fourth-grade student from Hillsboro, and of Oregon Gov. Kate Brown’s contest asking students to write letters about what they love about the state’s outdoors. Once you meet Brigette, it’s apparent why she was selected the winner from among 1,200 entries. She is a poised and accomplished young woman, who stole the show by singing a Christmas song and playing her violin.
The next morning I attended the Oregon Breakfast, in the. This event was hosted by Oregon’s senior senator, Ron Wyden, who was joined by Sen. Jeff Merkley and Rep. Greg Walden. The team brought some of the best Oregon has to offer with Stumptown Coffee, Bob’s Red Mill oatmeal and even donuts that were specially made “Portland-style.” Brigette took center stage again at this event with a lively reading of her winning entry in the governor’s essay contest, a poem about her love for all things Oregon, including puddle-jumping, hiking, fishing and Christmas-tree-cutting.
I met Brigette’s mother, Kim Harrington, at the breakfast. Kim is a fourth-grade teacher who takes her class to thefor a field trip each year. She was grateful for OFRI’s school , which helps make the trip possible.
Later that day same day I attended an afternoon reception at the(USDA). A little-known fact is that, in addition to supplying the “People’s Tree” for public display, Oregon provided an additional 75 smaller companion trees for offices and federal agencies around the Capitol. The Whitten Patio of the USDA features one of these trees. It is 22 feet tall and also decorated with handmade Christmas ornaments from Oregon. At the bottom of the tree is a beautiful handmade tree skirt that came from the Gone to Pieces Quilt Guild of McMinnville.
Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue spoke at this event and introduced another Oregon treasure, Nikki Swanson, a district ranger from the Sweet Home Ranger District. Nikki traveled with the U.S. Capitol Tree on its journey from Sweet Home to D.C. She described her experience of 20 consecutive days of joy, during the tree’s journey and at local events across the country. I jokingly asked her after she spoke if there weren’t some moments of stress along the way. She told me that every time a problem came up, everyone worked together to find a solution.
The tree-lighting itself took place a couple days later on Dec. 6. House Speaker Paul Ryan handed over the honor of lighting the tree to Brigette (on the right in the photo). Visitors from all across America stood in near-freezing temperatures and cheered after a brief countdown when the flick of a switch lit up the tree’s thousands of lights.
The 2018 U.S. Capitol Christmas Tree will be on display on the West Lawn of Capitol Hill until New Year’s Eve. During that time it will serve as a stunning showcase of Oregon’s natural beauty, our forests and the enthusiastic spirit of the Oregonians who made this gift to the nation possible.
The New Year is coming soon, and with it come two mass timber events you might want to mark your calendars to attend.
The first is the, scheduled for Jan. 15, 2019, at the . This one-day event is being presented by the and , the state’s economic development agency. The summit is designed to help public officials, economic development folks, investors and manufacturers (or manufacturer wannabes) learn about multiple facets of the mass timber industry. Speakers will discuss tools, strategies and potential partners available to help support sector development for the use or production of mass timber and related products in Oregon counties and municipalities. I’m on the planning committee, so I’m privy to the content development for the event, and I can say with confidence this summit offers a lot in the way of learning about the mass timber sector. It will identify opportunities for entrepreneurs and investors to become a part of the sector. The topics are well-thought-out, and the speaker list represents a wealth of knowledge. If the topic of mass timber and how you might get involved intrigues you, I recommend you before the spots run out.
The date for the summit was strategically chosen because it falls about two months before the fourth annual If the summit is the appetizer, the Mass Timber Conference is the entrée, the veggies, the sides, the wine, the dessert and the next day’s leftovers. OFRI is a co-sponsor and I’m on the steering committee, but even if we weren’t involved I’d be recommending this for anyone interested in learning about the current status of the mass timber movement. It is produced jointly by the and and the organizers expect at least 1,500 people (more than three times the number who attended the first Mass Timber Conference in 2016) to come to Portland for three jam-packed days of tours and presentations. Last year’s 800-plus attendees came from more than 20 countries, including as far away as Australia. With 20 concurrent panel discussions and three general sessions over two days, the conference will bring more than 80 mass timber experts from around the world to cover a wide range of topics.comes to Portland on March 19-21 at the .
The conference steering committee is still putting the finishing touches on the various panels, but I can say that sessions will include deep dives into a number of important topics. These include the carbon story of mass timber, cost comparisons of wood buildings compared to concrete and steel construction, lessons learned on where maximum savings can be realized, and mass timber design and detailing. There will also be sessions addressing the latest information around fire safety, seismic and acoustics research, tall wood code changes, hybrid construction projects, mass timber supply chain insights, latest developments internationally, and much, much more.
You should plan to attend – and make sure to come well-rested, because it can be an exhausting three days of nonstop learning and networking. Also, fair warning: The building tours typically sell out quickly, so if you plan to attend and you want in on a tour, you probably shouldnow.
I look forward to seeing you at one or both of these premier mass timber events coming early next year. Until then, happy holidays.
Director of Forest Products